Posts

The Age of Angst

Image
It should come as a surprise to no one that we are currently living in a very destabilizing and perscipitously dangerous time. I write "should" because, while we publically indicate to others our awareness of these times, such expressed acknowledgement flies in the face of recent historical programming drilled into our minds. Hear me out. Ever since the Industrial Revolution (the 19th Century revolution, and not the erstarz Fourth Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century), humanity in WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) nations have been literally conditioned to view the unfolding of history as an ever-progressing linear event, instead of the cyclical-based process of renewal that it has historically been seen as. The ancient Greeks and Romans understood history as a repetitive cycle of season-like stages. Romans called this cycle a saeculum and it usually lasted as long as a human lifetime (i.e. 60 to 80 years). From this Latin word, w

But wait, there's more!

Image
This will just be a brief continuum from my previous post, with the still centering on experts as propagandists. I was in my local library the other day and came across a surprisingly refreshing book on the subject I had lightly expounded upon the other day. The book is called "Delusions in Science and Spirituality: The Fall of the Standard Model and the Rise of Knowledge from Unseen Worlds" and was penned by Susan B. Martinez, Ph.D. In the very beginning of her book, Martinez lays right into the dangers of the rigid grand orthodoxy plaguing the scientific and technical community. Martinez uses the term "fundamental farces", originally uttered by another scientist, to refer to this collective ignorance of the truth involving everything from "evolution, ice ages, global warming, and so on". One interesting thing that Martinez points out regarding the surge in ignorant "experts" is overspecialization. This term refers to the absurdly particul

Experts as Propagandists

Image
It appears that the lesson in humility visited upon the "experts" of political observation back in 2016 has failed to resonate with that class of pundits let alone serve as teaching moment to "experts" in other fields. Considering things rationally, it should not surprise anyone that the members of these cadres of skilled elites are increasingly falling short of their prognostications. No one should be scratching their heads as to why "experts" filled with self-inflated superiority have been deflating in spectacular fashion, for their collective failures result from the misperception that the products of scientific efforts are the tabulated and summarized results of consensual group think. Operating under the aegis of such misguidance might be excusable if it only results in the failure to predict election outcomes, public interest in an IPO, or the small spread in predicted temperatures at a certain locality. However, such short-comings become not onl

How America became an empire and lost it's soul.

The American Century HENRY R. LUCE (first published in LIFE magazine 17 February 1941) We Americans are unhappy. We are not happy about America. We are not happy about ourselves in relation to America. We are nervous - or gloomy - or apathetic. As we look out at the rest of the world we are confused; we don't know what to do. "Aid to Britain short of war" is typical of halfway hopes and halfway measures. As we look toward the future - our own future and the future of other nations - we are filled with foreboding. The future doesn't seem to hold anything for us except conflict, disruption, war. There is a striking contrast between our state of mind and that of the British people. On Sept. 3, 1939, the first day of the war in England, Winston Churchill had this to say: "Outside the storms of war may blow and the land may be lashed with the fury of its gales, but in our hearts this Sunday morning there is Peace." Since Mr. Churchill spoke those words the

An Islamic Reformation

Image
In reading Michael Schuerer's book Marching Toward Hell , the author broached an intriguing subject. Those of us who have been laying the blame for the actions of radical Muslims on the doorstep of Islam have been castigated by opponents as narrow minded racists  (even though this has to do with a religion and not a race per se), Islamophobic, or seriously uneducated thus highly discriminatory. If what Schuerer writes is true, our 'war against Islam' may not be so impractical after all. Schuerer states that Islam, lacking a centralized authority in modern times (no Rome like leadership since the Caliphate ended in the early 20th century), Muslim populations relied on their local imams to direct them as to what was permissible in Islam. Over time, many of these Imams became corrupted by state leaders, thus the message they were imparting to their umma was not resonating with the congregation. It took the success of Osama bin Laden to break the followers away from the co

Missed Opportunities

Image
In Michael Schuerer's book March Toward Hell , the author traces the origin and rise of Islamism and it's penchant for violence. Schuerer writes that the first modern event that began the conflict we found ourselves in was the 1973 oil embargo and our support of Israel in the Yom Kippur War. By failing to find an alternative to our dependence on foreign oil and our blind allegiance to a nation that stirs the hatred of Muslims world wide, we began to link ourselves to a violent future. In 1982 Hezbollah arose in Lebanon and began opening training camps everywhere. The U.S. knew about these camps but did nothing. In 1990 the King of Saudi Arabia made the monumental decision to allow western troops on Muslim soil and we haven't left since. In the mid 90s, the Balkan war raged and Muslims depicted themselves as innocent victims.  Eager to castigate Slobodan Milosevic as the reincarnation of Hitler, the West approved of the publication of Muslim victimhood. During this time

Biting the Hand That Feeds

  What should be providing me with innumerable chances to laugh my ass off in fits of apoplectic irony, is instead another worrying sign that political correctness has run amok. In the past few months the bastions of elite liberalism, eschonced in the ivory towers of "do what I say, not as i do", have been under assault by disgruntled students waging a search and destroy mission throughout campuses nation wide, looking for racism, real or exaggerated. Finding "evidence" elicits cries of outrage and demands that the faculty and administration of the school crucify themselves to appease the angry mob. While I refuse to shed a tear for these martyrs to multiculturalism,  I can't help but grow concerned thinking of what these mindless protestors will do once they finish purging academia in their great Putsch? Who will be next?